Poor guy. Takes the part knowing Dent becomes Two-face, then gets passed up for Tommy Lee Jones. I think he still got a nice sum for it, and he got to avoid being in Batman Forever, so it's not all bad.
Someone suggested Bruce Willis for Harvey Dent if they ever film "The Dark Knight Returns." Aside from the paycheck, Billy Dee Williams probably considers himself lucky for skipping the Schumacher debacles.
Ignore the comments below. "Dark Knight Strikes Again" isn't much like DKR, but it's a heartfelt and very funny tribute to the Silver Age. Just don't expect more DKR, and you'll enjoy it.
[ed-wood]Stupid! Stupid! Your stupid minds![/ed-wood]
Seriously, I can understand why people didn't enjoy DKSA, especially if they were expecting DKR all over again. But I really feel the "bad" comments come from the fact that it's not DKR all over again (which would have been BORING), and the experimental art (which not unreasonably isn't everyone's cup of tea; myself I wonder why everybody has floppy clown feet in Miller's art, now.) It's not Miller's best work, but I enjoy it quite a bit and I honestly think it wouldn't have its terrible reputation if it hadn't been so overhyped/delayed.
No one wanted a duplication of DKR. We wanted a sequel, an extension. Not this... THING. If someone wants to see a good silver age style story, as opposed to the pieces of crap that seem to be all Miller is producing these days, you need only compare the sublime All-Star Superman to the execrable All-Star Batman and Robin.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 04:06 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 04:08 am (UTC)Ah, Billy Dee. So unloved.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 04:15 am (UTC)But he got a big 'ol hose, yah.
Did you photoshop your face onto Danny Trejo's body?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 04:28 am (UTC)I kid. Yup, my friend
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 04:14 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 11:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 04:57 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 05:28 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 10:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 11:34 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 11:38 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 01:06 pm (UTC)No?
Then read it.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 02:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 02:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 04:18 pm (UTC)Seriously, I can understand why people didn't enjoy DKSA, especially if they were expecting DKR all over again. But I really feel the "bad" comments come from the fact that it's not DKR all over again (which would have been BORING), and the experimental art (which not unreasonably isn't everyone's cup of tea; myself I wonder why everybody has floppy clown feet in Miller's art, now.) It's not Miller's best work, but I enjoy it quite a bit and I honestly think it wouldn't have its terrible reputation if it hadn't been so overhyped/delayed.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 04:56 pm (UTC)And haven't we had this discussion before?
no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 03:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 12:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 07:35 pm (UTC)Man, that would be a great icon.
no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 02:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 07:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-18 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-05-19 07:06 am (UTC)I'd like to steal that from you.