thebitterguy: (Default)
[personal profile] thebitterguy
[Poll #662689]

Yes, ladies and gentlemen! The battle has been brought down to Earth! Now, pick which of these two classic superspies would be triumpant in a battle of wits and cheezy gadgets!

Do you go with the dashing 007? Or the gruff head of S.H.I.E.L.D.?

Pick one! Pick NOW! Justify my love, and your choice!

You Pick the terrain! You pick the circumstances! Hell, you can pick if it's Hasselhoff Fury vs Roger Moore Bond!

Date: 2006-01-30 02:59 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] creativedv8tion.livejournal.com

See, I would've said Nick Fury, but then, I remembered there was that tv movie with Nick in it, and you might recall that The Hoff played Nick, and that just means that Nick's really a pussy, if a dickwad like The Hoff can portray him.

James Bond did have Timothy Dalton portray him, and that kinda weakened his power rating, but with the strong portrayals by Sean and Pierce, and even the ok job done by Roger, there's really no contest.

James is the shizzle, yo.

Date: 2006-01-30 04:00 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kinra.livejournal.com
I gotta say, the movies were howlers, but Dalton's portrayal was remarkably close to the hardened, misanthropic killer Fleming originally wrote. With some support from writers and directors, Dalton could totally boost Bond's power rating.

Less said about Lazenby, though...

Date: 2006-01-30 04:11 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] creativedv8tion.livejournal.com

Well, for me the attempt to PC things by making Dalton's Bond not so misogynistic/womanizing really fucked with things.

Ah, I kinda liked the Lazenby movie. Maybe it was b/c of the ending... *shrugs*

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] kinra.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-01-30 04:17 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] creativedv8tion.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-01-30 04:24 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nottheterritory.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-01-30 05:08 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] papajoemambo.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-01-30 03:02 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] creativedv8tion.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-01-31 02:50 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nottheterritory.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-01-31 05:39 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] nottheterritory.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-01-31 05:39 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2006-01-31 02:48 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewline.livejournal.com
C'mon, at least give the man credit for knowing who to be a fan of, won't ya?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] dewline.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-01-31 02:56 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] creativedv8tion.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-01-31 02:59 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2006-01-30 03:41 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thetathx1138.livejournal.com
How is this even up for debate? Bond all the way. Let's face it, Bond could take Doom. Bond could probably take on Kang and come out without much more than his hair ruffled.

Date: 2006-01-30 03:52 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] creativedv8tion.livejournal.com

Now, I have to disgree - Doom could take Bond just as easily as Bond taking Doom. Doom's got magic and other mojo that JB isn't used to dealing with. JB could seriously fuck up Doom's plans and stuff like that, but in a one-on-one, I'd have to go with the good Doctor D.

Date: 2006-01-30 05:23 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thetathx1138.livejournal.com
I doubt Bond is dumb enough to confront Doom directly. He'd undermine him from within and then attack when Doom is weakest.

Date: 2006-01-30 04:03 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] kinra.livejournal.com
If the Broccolis couldn't kill Bond, I don't think Nick Fury stands much of a chance. Ultimate Fury is "played" by Samuel L., who, while still the baddest m*****f***** in the room, has been in The Man and Formula 51 to balance out his Jules-fu.

He's resourceful, I'll grant you, and he runs S.H.I.E.L.D., but that just means Bond gets operational support beyond his own bad self. I think I gotta hand it to Mr. Kiss Kiss, Bang Bang here.

Date: 2006-01-30 04:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thetathx1138.livejournal.com
"If the Broccolis couldn't kill Bond, I don't think Nick Fury stands much of a chance. "

:::milk rockets out of nose:::

That's the funniest thing I've read in the last seven days!

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thetathx1138.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-01-30 05:25 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2006-01-30 06:19 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dogbreathcanada.livejournal.com
Ha ha. Die Nick Fury! Or should I say Nick Furry!

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] dewline.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-01-31 02:50 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: (Anonymous) - Date: 2006-02-01 09:09 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2006-01-30 02:17 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] redeem147.livejournal.com
Mr. Fury would be less distacted by silly things like Martinis, girls and whether the crease in his tuxedo paints looked just so.

Advantage Fury. He was, after all, head of the Howling Commandos.

Date: 2006-01-30 02:59 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] papajoemambo.livejournal.com


I think that anyone who started off as a comics fan is gonna say Fury has it over Bond. Vice-versa Bond fans.

All I need to say is this:

- Flying aircraft carriers
- Life Model Decoy robots that are so passable as their source person that they begin to think they are them - like a cool Robert Ludlum "deep-cover" story
- Flying cars
- Jetpacks in more than one episode
- Bad guys who could be your next door neighbour in a mask.
- OTHER bad guys who are disgruntled MENSA graduatesm with body surgery and a bad attitude.

...this is not mentioning the fact that eachof those evil organisations is headed by an ex-Nai who's had a grudge against the lead caharcter since they punched them in the face in WWII.

Fury might not beat Bond, because Bond MUST win in everything he's in (its in his contract), but Fury & Co. are 3 million times COOLER than Bond.

(EVEN when they're drawn by George Tuska - and that's going a ways).

Date: 2006-01-30 04:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thetathx1138.livejournal.com
Nah, Fury just isn't as cool as Bond. If he were, he'd score more often. As it is, nobody who smokes that many cigars and is that cranky has gotten any for at least two years. I might even push that up to five in Fury's case.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thetathx1138.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-01-30 05:29 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] dewline.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-01-31 02:52 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] papajoemambo.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-01-31 08:38 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thetathx1138.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-02-01 05:04 am (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] papajoemambo.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-02-01 07:02 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thetathx1138.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-02-01 08:49 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] papajoemambo.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-02-01 09:07 pm (UTC) - Expand

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] thetathx1138.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-02-01 09:56 pm (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2006-01-31 02:53 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewline.livejournal.com
Which reminds me...has anyone ever tried to top Eliot Brown's tech drawings for any class of Helicarrier?

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] dewline.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-02-01 01:30 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2006-01-30 03:00 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] papajoemambo.livejournal.com


..."Nai" being NAZI when typed on a cheap internet cafe keyboard.

Re: Go to and join:

From: [identity profile] perich.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-01-31 03:29 am (UTC) - Expand

Date: 2006-01-30 06:45 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rpriske.livejournal.com
If you can count the Hasselhof Fury, I can count the Ultimate Fury, in all his Samuel Jackson glory.

Fury wins.

Date: 2006-02-01 05:05 am (UTC)
From: (Anonymous)
The Ultimate Fury is, at least the way he's currently written, the kind of guy you send a guy like Bond to kill.

Date: 2006-01-31 05:36 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com
Bond has villains. Fury has supervillains. Simple as that.

However, I do not like Bond, and have no recollection of Fury aside from a couple borrowed issues of Ultimates. My opinion is of dubious relevance.

(no subject)

From: [identity profile] madmanofprague.livejournal.com - Date: 2006-02-01 04:21 am (UTC) - Expand

Profile

thebitterguy: (Default)
thebitterguy

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25 26272829 3031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 1st, 2026 01:25 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios