Let's hope this works, eh?
Jan. 23rd, 2006 01:33 pm[Poll #658382]
If this does not work, it won't get fixed 'till tonight. If it does, this paragraph will magically disappear tonight.
Edit: I COULD have removed that paragraph, I just didn't want to.
If this does not work, it won't get fixed 'till tonight. If it does, this paragraph will magically disappear tonight.
Edit: I COULD have removed that paragraph, I just didn't want to.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 12:46 am (UTC)Btw, you fucked up the last one - the correct answer is five.
Just in case y'hadn't heard.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 01:18 am (UTC)At least I got the number of separatist parties right...?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 03:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 03:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 03:36 am (UTC)Doug.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 03:38 am (UTC)Actually, I was too. I mean, I knew there was more in Canuckistania than our lousy bipartisan system here in Amerika, but had no idea there were so many with actual shares of the pie up there!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 03:52 am (UTC)Rick Dykstra CON 9304 35.06%
Jeff Burch NDP 5956 22.44%
Jim Fannon GRN 1176 4.43%
Bill Bylsma CHP 260 0.98%
Elaine Couto ML 49 0.18%
Here's my riding at this moment (129 0f 244 polling stations reporting). As you can see, as far as realistic "shares of the pie" go, the Marxist-Leninists and Christian Heritage Party aren't really in the same league as "The Big Four," one of which (the BQ) isn't allowed by its own mandate to run outside of Quebec.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 11:33 am (UTC)Shit, that was a close riding up there.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 09:04 pm (UTC)But if you want to throw your vote away in America, there are actually more than two parties. The Libertarians, The Greens, and the Constitution party all had a theoretical chance of getting a President in 2004. (Ha!)
Though one must wonder at the fairness of a system that doesn't allow the New York State Right to Life Party a chance to get a national president elected from their own.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 09:11 pm (UTC)Yar.
See, I made an assumption (bad me, I know), that since there was such active discussion of the other groups, they were actual contenders. Here, we've got way more than just the few "alternatives" that you mentioned, but nobody takes them seriously, so they're not discussed like they're real.