Let's hope this works, eh?
Jan. 23rd, 2006 01:33 pm[Poll #658382]
If this does not work, it won't get fixed 'till tonight. If it does, this paragraph will magically disappear tonight.
Edit: I COULD have removed that paragraph, I just didn't want to.
If this does not work, it won't get fixed 'till tonight. If it does, this paragraph will magically disappear tonight.
Edit: I COULD have removed that paragraph, I just didn't want to.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-23 06:56 pm (UTC)AACEV Party of Canada - Ms Liz White
Canadian Action - Ms. Constance (Connie) Fogal
First Peoples National Party - Ms. Barbara Wardlaw
Marxist-Leninist - Ms. Sandra L. Smith
Progressive Canadian Party - Ms. Tracy Parsons
That's five.
Ref: http://www.elections.ca/content.asp?section=pol&document=index&dir=par&lang=e&textonly=false#CAP
Doug.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-23 07:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-23 07:28 pm (UTC)Um. Justin, there are five female party leaders. ^_^;
no subject
Date: 2006-01-23 07:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-23 11:51 pm (UTC)Just tell them you define "party leader" as someone whose whole party will get more than 5 votes.
Then most of your questions are correct.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-23 11:54 pm (UTC)I'd vote Marxist-Lenninist, but they're splitters!
Splitters!
(I explainded this to the local Conservative canidate when he cornered me in the hallway of my condo building the other day. I took to it poorly, and started in on him about why the Communist parties split and asked him if he knew why they would do something so foolish. I then told him I'd come to Canada from the US so that I could vote Communist, because it is time the people took the power. At that point he ran away from me.)
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 12:15 am (UTC)Although I've never had the desire to vote Communist in 22 years of election entitlement, I really do like there emblem. The wheat and the cog inside the maple leaf? It's a well done emblem, there's no denying it.
In comparison, the ML emblem is decidedly ho-hum.
Doug.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 02:19 am (UTC)Hey, you should run for them! I'll bet the folks at work would LOVE that.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 03:35 am (UTC)I have the "Communist Party (http://waiwode.livejournal.com/319557.html)" wallpaper up at work. It gets ... well, let's say it doesn't drive guys as crzy-go-nuts as my habit of referring to everything as "The Peoples' X" from a couple years ago. "The Peoples' Truck" almost got me stabbed.
Being held at knife-point by people you've been egging on incessently all summer ... it's good fun.
Doug.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 01:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 12:13 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 12:44 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 02:09 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 02:17 am (UTC)http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Alliance_Environment_Voters_Party_of_Canada
Canadian Politics is not only stranger than we imagine, it's stranger than we can imagine
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 08:59 pm (UTC)OTOH I've only lived here for a year, so....
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 12:46 am (UTC)Btw, you fucked up the last one - the correct answer is five.
Just in case y'hadn't heard.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 01:18 am (UTC)At least I got the number of separatist parties right...?
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 02:00 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 03:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 03:18 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 03:36 am (UTC)Doug.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 03:38 am (UTC)Actually, I was too. I mean, I knew there was more in Canuckistania than our lousy bipartisan system here in Amerika, but had no idea there were so many with actual shares of the pie up there!
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 03:52 am (UTC)Rick Dykstra CON 9304 35.06%
Jeff Burch NDP 5956 22.44%
Jim Fannon GRN 1176 4.43%
Bill Bylsma CHP 260 0.98%
Elaine Couto ML 49 0.18%
Here's my riding at this moment (129 0f 244 polling stations reporting). As you can see, as far as realistic "shares of the pie" go, the Marxist-Leninists and Christian Heritage Party aren't really in the same league as "The Big Four," one of which (the BQ) isn't allowed by its own mandate to run outside of Quebec.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 11:33 am (UTC)Shit, that was a close riding up there.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 09:04 pm (UTC)But if you want to throw your vote away in America, there are actually more than two parties. The Libertarians, The Greens, and the Constitution party all had a theoretical chance of getting a President in 2004. (Ha!)
Though one must wonder at the fairness of a system that doesn't allow the New York State Right to Life Party a chance to get a national president elected from their own.
no subject
Date: 2006-01-24 09:11 pm (UTC)Yar.
See, I made an assumption (bad me, I know), that since there was such active discussion of the other groups, they were actual contenders. Here, we've got way more than just the few "alternatives" that you mentioned, but nobody takes them seriously, so they're not discussed like they're real.