Certainly. The problem is that for the last 30 or so years, Canada has been getting better about human rights issues, and overall, the US has been getting worse.
Partly, it's because our government here in the US seems to think that locking people up for 25 years for taking a puff of marijuana, and spending billions of dollars on fighting drugs that are less harmful than alcohol and cigarettes, is justifiable exercise of power.
Also, I'm tempted to say something about the desperation that comes with a combination of lower minimum wage and very limited public health care. Despite America in general being wealthier, the working poor in America make less money than the working poor in Canada, and when that gets combined with having to pay $600 anytime you need to go to the emergency room, it's easy to get really desperate really fast.
And institutionalized desperation and a country whose leaders run everything based on fear leads to stupidity responded to with brutality.
People love making grand statements like that but I want to see a breakdown by tax bracket first. My observation of how the system works in all-white areas like the rural Northeast against how it operates somewhere like Boston indicates that systemic racism is not a direct factor.
Living in Los Angeles I saw both, and sometimes it wasn't easily possible to say which was which at the moment.
In general, my point was more about class than race. I think they both play roles, but the working poor squeeze is something that happens to Americans of lots of colors.
1: Cananda has a lower population density. The more people you have crowded together, the more stress and anger that builds up.
2: A much greater rift between the "haves" and "have nots"
3: Larger organized crime and street gangs.
4: The CIA, police, Stock Exchange, and organized crime making billions of dollars a year on the illegal drug trade, the laundering of drug money, the confiscation of money, items, cars, and homes belonging to drug users and dealers.
5: A Judicial system dedicated more towards imprisionment and fines than rehabilitation.
6: No health care for most citizens and a capitolistic medical and drug industry that uses the fact that they are an indispensable commodity to price gouge the public (oh and the legislative offices that make doctors and hospitals have malpractice and negligence insurance, but doesn't regulate rates so that the insurance companies price gouge doctors and hospitals REALLY bad as well).
7: Fewer parents actually taking care of their kids and instilling in them discipline, ethics, and responsibility. They are either a household that has parents that are working two jobs each just to get by, or single parents who have to work two jobs to get by.
As everyone's pretty much established, in a nutshell it's the War on Drugs; instead of spending almost half as much to put people in a mandatory confinement drug rehab program (most programs of that sort only having a recidivism rate of 30ish percent), America would rather spend more money to put them in a prison, with no treatment, and a 60+% recidivism rate.
Add to that the very common 3 strikes/habitual offender laws, and then you have people doing large bids of time for it. Contributing to the younger members of the same families falling into similar situations... it's a replicating cycle.
A lot of people have already (correctly) blamed differing tolerances for low-end drug offenders, but the other big cause isn't racism or America being just-more-violent or anything like that; it's simply that Canada has a social services net to help people in need, and America for the most part does not.
Our net, frankly, isn't nearly as big as it could be - blame Mike Harris and "common sense" politics for exploding the homeless population, for a start - but we don't turn to the prison system as a de facto end solution for all social ills.
1) Our population is much lower therefore fewer criminals to begin with and then fewer crowded big cities where crime is prevalent. 2) We're Canadians. 3) They're Americans.
You don't know me, nor my sense of humour and therefore could not have known that points 2 & 3 were meant in jest. May I recommend that in future you leave comments you don't understand to the people they are intended for so that you are not further unnecessarily troubled by the comments of strangers.
Oh, I got the humor and that it was how it was meant, I just didn't find it funny. Don't assume that someone didn't get a joke just because they didn't appreciate it.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 07:52 pm (UTC)ETA: Due to good points below, I amend to racism and/or classism.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 08:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 08:59 pm (UTC)http://www.hiddenfromhistory.org/
no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 09:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 07:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 07:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 07:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 07:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 07:57 pm (UTC)Also, I'm tempted to say something about the desperation that comes with a combination of lower minimum wage and very limited public health care. Despite America in general being wealthier, the working poor in America make less money than the working poor in Canada, and when that gets combined with having to pay $600 anytime you need to go to the emergency room, it's easy to get really desperate really fast.
And institutionalized desperation and a country whose leaders run everything based on fear leads to stupidity responded to with brutality.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 08:05 pm (UTC)But class, on the other hand? A major one.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 08:08 pm (UTC)Living in Los Angeles I saw both, and sometimes it wasn't easily possible to say which was which at the moment.
In general, my point was more about class than race. I think they both play roles, but the working poor squeeze is something that happens to Americans of lots of colors.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 08:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 08:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 08:11 pm (UTC)Like, moving from LA to Toronto I became 1/20th as likely to be murdered, but only like 5% less likely to be stabbed as a result of a robbery.
(These numbers may have changed in the years I've lived here, but I recall that being pretty much the score 5 years ago.)
But yea, fewer murderers to jail for sure.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 09:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 08:31 pm (UTC)2: A much greater rift between the "haves" and "have nots"
3: Larger organized crime and street gangs.
4: The CIA, police, Stock Exchange, and organized crime making billions of dollars a year on the illegal drug trade, the laundering of drug money, the confiscation of money, items, cars, and homes belonging to drug users and dealers.
5: A Judicial system dedicated more towards imprisionment and fines than rehabilitation.
6: No health care for most citizens and a capitolistic medical and drug industry that uses the fact that they are an indispensable commodity to price gouge the public (oh and the legislative offices that make doctors and hospitals have malpractice and negligence insurance, but doesn't regulate rates so that the insurance companies price gouge doctors and hospitals REALLY bad as well).
7: Fewer parents actually taking care of their kids and instilling in them discipline, ethics, and responsibility. They are either a household that has parents that are working two jobs each just to get by, or single parents who have to work two jobs to get by.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 08:40 pm (UTC)Not really. Most of Canada's population lives in high population density areas.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 09:07 pm (UTC)I am continually amazed with how many people live down there.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-01 09:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 09:40 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 08:45 pm (UTC)I got nothing.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 10:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 11:15 pm (UTC)As everyone's pretty much established, in a nutshell it's the War on Drugs; instead of spending almost half as much to put people in a mandatory confinement drug rehab program (most programs of that sort only having a recidivism rate of 30ish percent), America would rather spend more money to put them in a prison, with no treatment, and a 60+% recidivism rate.
Add to that the very common 3 strikes/habitual offender laws, and then you have people doing large bids of time for it. Contributing to the younger members of the same families falling into similar situations... it's a replicating cycle.
no subject
Date: 2008-02-29 11:47 pm (UTC)Our net, frankly, isn't nearly as big as it could be - blame Mike Harris and "common sense" politics for exploding the homeless population, for a start - but we don't turn to the prison system as a de facto end solution for all social ills.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-01 12:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-01 02:52 am (UTC)2) We're Canadians.
3) They're Americans.
Nuff said.
no subject
Date: 2008-03-01 09:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-01 11:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-03-02 01:37 am (UTC)*shrugs*
As you say, we don't know each other. Moving on.