As 20-year-old cold war comic series go, Watchmen has certainly proven to have staying power. 2009 will see the release of a film based on the iconic graphic novel.
I read on Progressive Ruin that at least in some comics stores Watchmen is still a strong seller. That led to the question, is there anyone who reads comics who hasn't read Watchmen?
So, yes. Poll. I think you know what to do now.
[Poll #1104300]
p.s. If you're not sure if you're a comic book reader or not, you probably aren't.
I read on Progressive Ruin that at least in some comics stores Watchmen is still a strong seller. That led to the question, is there anyone who reads comics who hasn't read Watchmen?
So, yes. Poll. I think you know what to do now.
[Poll #1104300]
p.s. If you're not sure if you're a comic book reader or not, you probably aren't.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 09:31 pm (UTC)And yep, I've read it.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-12 05:52 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 06:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 08:33 pm (UTC)Once a comic book reader...
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 10:03 pm (UTC)Yeah, ditto... In fact, I blame Watchmen for being a former comic book reader - after Watchmen, there seeemed little point to read superhero comics anymore, really...
Cu,
Andrew
no subject
Date: 2007-12-12 05:53 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-13 05:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-14 12:28 am (UTC)I did enjoy Peter David and McFarlane's run on the hulk (which may have come after Watchmen, come to think of it). Other than that, though, I've never found the Hulk to be a very compelling character. All that "Hulk smash!" crap gets on my nerves.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:15 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:22 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:45 pm (UTC)I suspect that if nowhere else, there's a non-circulating copy in the Merril Collection. Graphic novels often seem to go missing from the system, and end up kept in collections where they aren't allowed to leave the building.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-12 12:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-13 05:56 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:21 pm (UTC)Problem with your methodology....?
Date: 2007-12-11 04:36 pm (UTC)I don't make it to comic stores very often any more, but when I do I walk out with a few books, so I count myself as a reader, but I'm sure some will argue with that...
And yes, I read Watchmen back in 1991 or so, borrowed it from my room-mate's collection. I don't have a copy myself, although I've been thinking of picking up the TPB.
Re: Problem with your methodology....?
Date: 2007-12-11 04:43 pm (UTC)Besides, it's a poll on a livejournal. Not the definition of scientific.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 04:47 pm (UTC)When The Watchmen started coming out in 1986 I was twenty. Me and all my friends devoured it, issue by issue.
Kevin already knew about Moore from his early 80's Swamp Thing. But that first cover*, with all the blood along the top half and part of the smiley face with the blood spatter on it down at the bottom? We new this wasn't going to be "the same old stuff."
And then it opens, with "A dog carcass in the alley."
For the first time in forever, we had "waiting for the next issue" anxiety. And the extra stories in the back? That (at the time) pointless pirate story? I hated it, taking away critical space out of each issue for what was throughout the eighties a common feature in small-press comics, the "filler project."
Doug.
*Honestly, I think the stone angel from issue #2 was my favourite.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 05:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 10:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-13 06:00 pm (UTC)The story is well worth it.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 07:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 07:35 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 09:08 pm (UTC)And, to blaspheme (sorry, bitterdude) further, I'd say that means it hasn't aged particularily well, but will nevertheless be a mainstay of Comic Book Studies courses for generations to come.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 09:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 10:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-13 06:10 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 07:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-11 07:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-13 06:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-12 01:54 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-12-13 06:09 pm (UTC)Apparently, the contract specifies that if it goes out of print Moore gets the rights to the series back.
no subject
Date: 2007-12-12 02:50 am (UTC)And this is what I think of the movie:
http://www.popmatters.com/pm/columns/article/41478/who-will-watch-the-watchmen/