I was wandering through
ghostwes backlog when I stumbled on this pair of blog postings about the aesthetics of fantasy.
My personal failings prevent me from enjoying it as much as I should (the failings being dat I is dum), but it's neat to read an article about fantasy done by a guy who really doesn't like the genre. The real point being this quote from a comment that Wes pointed out that I also enjoyed:
Hee. I am inspired for my next D&D character. He will be an elf gangsta. What kind of ethnic slur can he be reclaiming? I suggest "woody". Or possibly pointy.
My personal failings prevent me from enjoying it as much as I should (the failings being dat I is dum), but it's neat to read an article about fantasy done by a guy who really doesn't like the genre. The real point being this quote from a comment that Wes pointed out that I also enjoyed:
An interesting tangent to the idea of fantasy being about bling is the fantasy RPG which most definitely IS a crypto-Objectivist bare-knuckle capitalist fantasy in which the peasants spend their lives with their feet in shit while the "elite" go around collecting huge mountains of gold, killing anyone that stands in their way and covering themselves in magical bling.
Hee. I am inspired for my next D&D character. He will be an elf gangsta. What kind of ethnic slur can he be reclaiming? I suggest "woody". Or possibly pointy.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 04:51 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 05:11 pm (UTC)Where's Ryan Dancey when you need him?
no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 05:00 pm (UTC)you should be reclaiming "Sylvan."
no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 05:21 pm (UTC)"My, you're looking... sylvan tonight."
no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 06:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 05:34 pm (UTC)"I have no understanding of the fantasy genre. I think it's all like the Lord of the Rings movies, which I'm pissed about winning Best Picture because of their simplistic moral viewpoint. I also have no sense of humor. So, I will use the education earned from my several degrees to throw a hissy fit in public."
You're not the dumb one here; this guy is just a jackass. Man, he'd better pray Harlan Ellison doesn't read this, otherwise he's in for the most excruciating public humiliation of his life.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 05:51 pm (UTC)Thank-you; that made my afternoon.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 07:55 pm (UTC)Roleplaying is (or perhaps should be) so much bigger than KTATTS.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 08:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 01:50 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 02:21 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 02:45 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 05:22 am (UTC)In fact, I better go hide now.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 12:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 07:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 07:30 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 07:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 08:17 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-04 08:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 01:56 am (UTC)1) It's relatively short -- barely 100,000 words, so it's not a Tome, and that was mainly a design decision on my part. I didn't *want* to write a long book, and I didn't want to have to make the reader go through the equivalent of three books' worth of PLOT to get one book worth of STORY.
2) The mechanics of the world are also kept comparatively brief. I spent more time on the characters and their psychologies (which is really what drives everything, including the way their world works).
Rules aside, I hope I did a decent job and didn't simply write something laughable. That's why reading these two was actually pretty eye-opening: they gave me a sliver of hope that I did do something right. Or, better yet, that I did something interesting.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 05:28 am (UTC)An Objectivist D&D character would be awesome! Perhaps a selfish, uber-capitalist cleric who actually worships Ayn Rand as a goddess. Wait, that's too close to real Objectivism.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 07:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-05 07:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-09 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-09 04:00 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-09 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-04-09 05:59 pm (UTC)Maybe it's time to introduce a new human demi-god, Nyranada, of greed and selfishness? If Nyranda is too subtle, there's always Dnarnya, but that sounds like it has something to do with C.S. Lewis.
Then again, I always run my Waukeenar NPCs as if they were objectivists anyway. They'll do practically anything that won't get them in trouble for money, and always require a guarantee of payment from the players for any service. They make reasonably shrewd bargains. Ironically that often makes them both the most and least liked religion among my players. Some players are just happy that the priests don't impose silly requirements on their "customers" like refusing to resurrection people who follow gods of different alignments or requiring good deeds be performed in recompense for miracles granted. Others are annoyed that they always charge money, for everything, and then there's the "I have to go check with the high priest, she's tough, though and I think she's not going to buy into this, but I'll go to bat for you" routine, that some of them really hate.
no subject
Date: 2007-04-09 06:28 pm (UTC)Crazy
Date: 2007-04-09 07:18 pm (UTC)Because from what I hear, Kings and Queens were all about the Bling long before capitalism had a name, much less objectivism.
Alternatively, you could look at it as kind of parable of middle class life. You start off owning very little, and knowing a little bit. Then you work to learn more and earn your way. If you're good enough at what you, eventually you may become powerful and famous. All along the while you pick up stuff to help you do your job better, or even just stuff to make your home (be it castle, tower, or burrow) a little better.
I think the slang that the character was trying to reclaim is going to have to depend on the setting a bit. Unless, of course, you plan on having the characte be delusional in the persecution. I did a google search to see if I could find any samples but the best one was from Shadowpunk "Keebs" which obviously doesn't make any sense in traditional fantasy. Pointees, sylvs, faes, or tree-huggers might work. If your game has a keltish feels "Sidhes" or "Sids" might word work, in the Forgotten Realms, "Telqs" from the elven name "Tel'Quissar" might work as well. Additionally, a derogatory name for the nation the elves come from might work as well.
Of course, you could always use "elf" as the derogatory term, and try to convince people that they should call you a "Tel'Quissar" (or similar made-up name) instead.