Two things:
Mar. 19th, 2007 10:05 amA) No music video from the '90s should be on a channel called MuchMoreRetro
B) One of The National Post's discarded writers did a piece (a piece of what?) in yesterday's Sunday Star about coloured folk in comics. Now, as an almost white person (the kind airport security likes to gently caress), I have my own viewpoints on this, but two thoughts came to me after reading this piece (and Stuard Immonen's analysis).
First off, why would an ex-Postie suddenly care about racial and women's issues? I mean, is it guilt? A bet? Did he just really, really want to get an article in for black history month? Or does he really, sincerely, think the decline of the comics industry can be traced to it's lack of minority and female representation?
Secondly, why is this in Science and Technology?
But, in any case, I bring it to you, the reading public.
[Poll #949544]
B) One of The National Post's discarded writers did a piece (a piece of what?) in yesterday's Sunday Star about coloured folk in comics. Now, as an almost white person (the kind airport security likes to gently caress), I have my own viewpoints on this, but two thoughts came to me after reading this piece (and Stuard Immonen's analysis).
First off, why would an ex-Postie suddenly care about racial and women's issues? I mean, is it guilt? A bet? Did he just really, really want to get an article in for black history month? Or does he really, sincerely, think the decline of the comics industry can be traced to it's lack of minority and female representation?
Secondly, why is this in Science and Technology?
But, in any case, I bring it to you, the reading public.
[Poll #949544]
no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 02:41 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 03:19 pm (UTC)Not all actors who play straight are straight, and not all who play gay are gay.
I assume that there are lots of writers who write right who are, in fact, left; and vice-versa.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 02:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 02:45 pm (UTC)Dealing with race not as a matter of inclusiveness, but as a matter of untapped market -- to me, THAT smacks of racism. "Hey, let's start paying attention to these people now that our sales are flagging!"
That said, I don't think that the recent addition of an Asian Atom, a Black Firestorm, and a Hispanic Blue Beetle are attempts to target ethnic markets. I think it's the opposite -- the years of "whitewashing" were economically-driven, because the publishers believed that non-white heroes Wouldn't Sell.
More later, and elsewhere.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 08:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 08:55 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 02:53 pm (UTC)A) No music video from the '90s should be on a channel called MuchMoreRetro
A song from 1990 is now about SEVENTEEN years old... I'm just sayin'...
Cu,
Andrew
no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 08:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-20 12:02 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 02:58 pm (UTC)It was printed in the ideas section of the paper which is filed under science and tech on the website, which I suppose makes it a slightly less WTF place for it to turn up.
As for the thesis, I think the writer inadvertently hits the nail on the head where he writes (or quotes, I can't recall) that comics are written almost exclusively by fanboys for the fanboy audience - hence the lack of diversity. I don't think the lack of diversity (whether you believe it to be perceived or real - FWIW, I think it's a real problem) is not the cause of the shrinkage in the market but rather a symptom of the shrinkage. Mainstream publishers (especially) keep going back to tap that middle class (Judeo-Christian) white guy well which is the bedrock of their market and as the market shrinks, more and more comics are marketed directly at that audience with the unintentioned effect of turning off readers who either are looking for more diverse and/or nuanced stories or are not part of that audience.
Where was Immonen's commmentary, btw? I'd like to read that.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 08:25 pm (UTC)There's an LJ feed for it too.
no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 04:11 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 08:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 05:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 06:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 08:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-19 09:02 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2007-03-20 12:14 am (UTC)