You know, I'm no expert, no grad from a cultural studies program, but I'm pretty sure This Battlestar Galactica review is within spitting distance of crazy.
Anyone think there's any validitity to it? I mean, I don't really like the show that much, myself, but this review indicates some kind of issues. I will note they don't even mention the ugly pilot character.
Anyone think there's any validitity to it? I mean, I don't really like the show that much, myself, but this review indicates some kind of issues. I will note they don't even mention the ugly pilot character.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-17 10:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-17 10:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-17 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-17 10:30 pm (UTC)reviewer := crazy;
end.
Probably too much emphasis on the role of women in the show. Although she didn't mention Starbuck at all (which you note), probably because of Starbuck flying in the face of her fauxneofeministtheory lunacy.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-17 10:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 12:38 am (UTC)In my opinion, the male and female characters in the show are pretty much equally accusable of stereotyping. But, ahem, doesn't melodrama depend on stereotypes to a certain degreee? I think it's fairly safe to call BSG a melodrama, isn't it? I'm not sure it has much in the way of pretensions to drama: it's pretty much plot driven rather than character driven (although, the characters do tend to be more carefully drawn than in similar shows, which helps explain why it's pretty good).
no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 03:05 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 06:35 am (UTC)But "stern but wise father-figure who wrestles with his own fears of inadequacy and secrets from his past" is still Adama, essentially. Etc. etc.
The Cylon vibe is interesting, as well, because it allows them to cast stereotypical roles through the lens of a radically different culture.
By calling it melodrama, I don't mean to demean the show: I think it's well made. But it's definitely melodrama more than it's drama.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 08:13 am (UTC)I did say "start to fall to bits." I suppose I should have just said "start to develop facets to their otherwise stereotypical natures."
no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 04:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 12:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 03:03 am (UTC)I also thought that the fact that the evil Cylons were the only females who were "sexual beings" was more a commentary on the perceptions of the males who fall victim to them rather than any sort of commentary on female sexuality as an evil—but that's probably just another facet of what you're saying. The Cylons were, after all, toasters.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 08:22 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 02:28 pm (UTC)Of the males I thought only Gaius and the Chief demonstrated any sort of sex drive, both on the business end of Cylons... except for the Lee-Dee-Billy thing.
But as I said, my memory of the first season is hazy at best and I tend to smoosh together the seventeen episodes that comprise the first season and early events on the second in my mind.
I certainly think that one can make that sort of argument and read all sorts of gender issues stuff, because aspects of it are present. But it's also too generalised a comment to say that the only women with sex drives are Cylons. It ignores the role of the men in the series at this point—by and large they are devoid of sex drives as well (except Gaius). So possible, potentially interesting, and ludicrous.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-17 10:31 pm (UTC)The recent New Caprica storyline which saw the majority of the human characters under a Cylon occupation has been footballed a bit as either sympathy for the terrorists or NeoCon-ism - but the storyline actually brings in elements from everything from Vichy France to Afghanistan, so saying that they were speaking allegorically about Iraq specifically or any other neo-con cause celebre is pretty stupid.
So yes, spitting distance of crazy.
WTF?
Date: 2006-12-17 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-17 11:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-17 11:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 12:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 12:43 am (UTC)It's all very well to brand BSG as being "all white" when what you really mean is "mostly not black", but there's a great temptation for this confusion to be made in modern commentary.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 12:40 am (UTC)It is very much a post 2001 geek TV show, which means that the gender equality of shows like Xena, B-5, DS: 9, Buffy, and 2nd-4th season Angel is largely absent from TV. BSG isn't as good as any of these shows wrt gender, but it is also far better than most modern TV.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 02:58 am (UTC)But I am completely the opposite of what this writer thinks of the show. The slutty stilletto version of the cylon is just in Gious' imagination. Its an implant or subconscious memory.. or something I dont know.
The whole point of the Cylons imitating humans is to blend in and emulate them. Of course they will come in different flavours.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 06:49 am (UTC)I have theories on what Gaius-Six is, but they're not really mid-season-one spoiler safe, so I won't talk about 'em here.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 03:14 am (UTC)But the fact that he/she pines wistfully for Babylon 5 indicates that he/she is, in fact, crazy. ;-)
no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 06:58 am (UTC)Well... it may be true that a reader/viewer can do that, but then the responsible reader/viewer should try and make a decent case that the text actually supports their response.
And certainly something you can say about it can be "wrong", if we understand "wrong" to mean completely or wholly unsupported by the text. But I think you're correct in this respect: "wrong" is a loaded word. Perhaps safer to say only that this particular reviewer doesn't seem to have made a decent case for the presented observations about the text.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-18 09:01 pm (UTC)I shudder to think of her reaction to the Pegasus episodes.
no subject
Date: 2006-12-19 02:48 am (UTC)There's a real problem in SF fan criticism now; instead of metaphor being a good thing, now it ALL has to be metaphor. I don't claim to have seen every episode, but what I've seen of BSG is as divorced from American political concerns as Swedish cooking. I suppose that conservatives can find succor in it, but so can liberals, especially if you interpret the Cylons as being the current administration.
Which is, of course, batshit. But there you go.