thebitterguy: (Default)
[personal profile] thebitterguy
There's a new Punisher movie coming out this fall.

I wonder if it will be the good one? Or just continue the trend?

Date: 2008-01-22 01:41 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] life-on-queen.livejournal.com
Ray Stevenson (Titus Pullo) is playing Castle, so I have hopes. But then they released a pic and he looked like Segal in the photo, so my hopes have been proportionally downsized.

Date: 2008-01-22 01:44 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lowercaseem.livejournal.com
I was also going to comment that the cast looked hopeful.

Then I remembered it's a movie adaptation of a comic book.

Date: 2008-01-22 02:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thetathx1138.livejournal.com
Ouch. Didn't like "Ghost World" or "American Splendor", huh?

Date: 2008-01-22 02:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] waiwode.livejournal.com
The first one is based on my favourite (as in the only one I've read, and that on a recommendation from others) Punisher TP.

Which made it kind of extra disappointing.

Of all the Marvel properties, this has got to be one of the ones I'm least interested in seeing on film. I mean, the whole Guy-with-a-gun-getting-revenge thing is so ... 80's.

Now ... a Punisher & Dazzler movie? Hells yes!

(On a slightly serious note, when it comes to darkness and light, a Cloak & Dagger movie might be neat).

Date: 2008-01-22 02:30 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] creativedv8tion.livejournal.com

Ghost World was boring.

Date: 2008-01-22 02:31 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] creativedv8tion.livejournal.com

Yeah, b/c two runaways with super powers, black and white in harmony, that's so not-80s... ;)

Date: 2008-01-22 02:48 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thetathx1138.livejournal.com
Heh, I was just being a smartass. :-)

Date: 2008-01-22 04:16 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] creativedv8tion.livejournal.com

Oh, don't get me wrong, I dug Cloak and Dagger back in the day; I thought there was a lot of potential there. Haven't read much of Runaways, so I'm not sure what was done, but maybe I'll see about finding some to find out.

And nitting picks here, but the drugs just 'awakened' their mutant powers (well, editorially they were later turned into mutants when Marvel made just about everyone some form of mutant - even Spidey and Hulk were classified as latent mutants who were altered by exterior radioactive stimuli...)

Date: 2008-01-22 04:22 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] dewline.livejournal.com
Drugrunners who suckered them into a trap where they couldn't say no to being disposable lab rats, as I recall. If any characters in the Marvel roster serve as halfway-decent anti-drug message characters, it's these two. They were designed for it.

Date: 2008-01-22 04:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] circus13.livejournal.com
Come on, you know it's gonna be good with a Roman legionnaire from ROME as the Punisher and WAYNE KNIGHT as Microchip! How can you go wrong with that combination!?

Scientifically speaking...

Date: 2008-01-22 05:09 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] absinthe-dot-ca.livejournal.com
Actually, I'm hopeful - I think it's a given that the last movie was far better than the Dolph Lundgren one. At that rate, the next one should be positively Shakespearean in nature, by extrapolating the curve. Of course, plotting a curve based on two data points has an error rate of plus/minus about a thousand percent, but whatever.

And I agree with life_on_queen - I saw a promo shot for the first time a few weeks ago and I thought "What the hell? Did they get Steven Seagal as the Punisher?"

If nothing else, there might be a new t-shirt design for me... Because, you know, I don't have enough skull shirts already.

Date: 2008-01-22 06:27 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] absinthe-dot-ca.livejournal.com
I think this (http://www.comicbookmovie.com/news/articles/4141.asp) is the image I was referring to anyway....

Date: 2008-01-22 07:37 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lowercaseem.livejournal.com
I haven't managed to sit through all of GHOST WORLD.

AMERICAN SLENDO[U]R was entertaining.

Perhaps I should rephrase it:
"Then I remembered it is a movie adaptation of a pulpy Marvel comic book."

Date: 2008-01-22 07:39 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thetathx1138.livejournal.com
Still, you've got "Hulk", "Blade" and the first X-Men movies to deal with. None of them are perfect (well, I feel strongly that "Hulk" is one of the best movies Hollywood's put out this decade, but I'm in the minority on that one) but as mainstream action silliness goes, they're all well put together.

Date: 2008-01-22 08:01 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] lowercaseem.livejournal.com
I would only have to deal with those three movies (it will be an extremely cold day in hell before I accept that X-MEN 2 or 2.5 are good; I'm accepting BLADE for the sake of argument.) if they weren't the exceptions.

There have been so many comic adaptations recently that the bubble will be bursting any day now. It is inevitable.

The Punisher is itself a sort of mainstream action silliness adapted into comic form. That genre has almost sailed all by its lonesome, nevermind as a comic adaptation.

I am still hopeful for a bit of mindlessness put on the screen in an entertaining way. But the wealth of recent evidence leads me to conclusion that it is only HOPE which allows me to entertain that idea...

Blah di blah, shit disturber :P

Re: Scientifically speaking...

Date: 2008-01-22 08:03 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] creativedv8tion.livejournal.com

I think it's a given that the last movie was far better than the Dolph Lundgren one.

Pretty much any movie can be assumed to be better than the Dolph Lundgren Punisher movie.

Date: 2008-01-22 08:06 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] thetathx1138.livejournal.com
Oh, I definitely agree with you on that bubble. And Marvel's leveraged to the eyeballs on that bubble, too. It's going to be UGLY.

Date: 2008-01-22 08:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] gamera-spinning.livejournal.com
Well, at least it isn't Ray Stevens (http://www.raystevens.com/). That would be like Dolph Lundrgen all over again.

Date: 2008-01-22 09:29 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] life-on-queen.livejournal.com
Sorry. Check out Coming Soon.

Re: Scientifically speaking...

Date: 2008-01-22 09:46 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rentagurkha.livejournal.com
Not true. It's not even the worst movie based on a Marvel comic. In fact I think it only barely cracks the Top 5 worst Marvel Comics Adaptations.

Re: Scientifically speaking...

Date: 2008-01-22 10:07 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rentagurkha.livejournal.com
Also Howard the Duck, Daredevil, Roger Corman's Fantastic Four, Captain America (1990 version).

Re: Scientifically speaking...

Date: 2008-01-22 10:08 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] rentagurkha.livejournal.com
Ah, I see you remembered the ones I was thinking of. Plus, as I mentioned, the Daredevil with Ben Affleck.

Date: 2008-01-22 10:15 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] commanderteddog.livejournal.com
I'm holding out for a movie version of the Punisher/Archie crossover myself.

Date: 2008-01-22 11:56 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] atomiks.livejournal.com
I dunno. The first Punisher taught me all sorts of new and inventive ways to kill bad guys!

Profile

thebitterguy: (Default)
thebitterguy

December 2022

S M T W T F S
    123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25 26272829 3031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 9th, 2026 11:20 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios