Account name:
Password
(OpenID?)
(Forgot it?)
Remember Me
You're viewing
thebitterguy
's journal
Create a Dreamwidth Account
Learn More
Interest
Region
Site and Account
FAQ
Email
Reload page in style:
site
light
thebitterguy
(no subject)
(no subject)
Jul
.
16th
,
2004
10:53 pm
thebitterguy
Anyone seen any good fan over-reactions to I Robot yet?
Here's one.
Threaded
|
Top-Level Comments Only
no subject
Date:
2004-07-17 03:59 am (UTC)
From:
indefatigable42.livejournal.com
Boo yah.
I have said many times that this movie could sae the world-- we could power a few large cities with the kinetic energy of Dr. Asimov rolling in his grave.
no subject
Date:
2004-07-17 06:01 am (UTC)
From:
terheyt.livejournal.com
I am sure the Good Doctor is not rolling in his grave.
He is generating high torque. ;P
no subject
Date:
2004-07-17 01:55 pm (UTC)
From:
pyat.livejournal.com
I heard at least one reviewer say it was very good, and true to the spirit, if not the actual events, of the book.
So, I am torn. :)
I'll wait for that delightful Ebert to weigh in!
You're just lazy, you know that?
Date:
2004-07-17 02:19 pm (UTC)
From:
thebitterguy
http://www.suntimes.com/output/ebert1/wkp-news-robot16f.html
Re: You're just lazy, you know that?
Date:
2004-07-17 04:43 pm (UTC)
From:
paolom.livejournal.com
Is there a SINGLE review that is not bad?
Re: You're just lazy, you know that?
Date:
2004-07-18 03:54 pm (UTC)
From:
thebitterguy
http://www.rottentomatoes.com/m/i_robot/
Amusingly enough, it appears that a majority of reviewers like it, enough for it to earn a Fresh ratting from RT.com.
I do not endorse thse opinions. I simply report them.
6 comments
Reply
Threaded
|
Top-Level Comments Only
Profile
thebitterguy
Recent Entries
Archive
Reading
Tags
Memories
Profile
December
2022
S
M
T
W
T
F
S
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
Most Popular Tags
anecdote
-
169 uses
bitter guide
-
20 uses
buffy
-
21 uses
canada
-
118 uses
cats
-
24 uses
cinema
-
290 uses
comedy
-
24 uses
comics
-
354 uses
con life
-
132 uses
dr. who
-
42 uses
family
-
46 uses
fandom
-
26 uses
firefly
-
18 uses
food
-
108 uses
gaming
-
400 uses
halo
-
25 uses
health
-
45 uses
heroclix
-
25 uses
holiday
-
19 uses
holidays
-
28 uses
home life
-
32 uses
hoo'd win
-
66 uses
humour
-
148 uses
interenetery
-
89 uses
internetery
-
509 uses
literature
-
62 uses
lj
-
186 uses
lost
-
63 uses
married life
-
141 uses
meme
-
21 uses
memes
-
33 uses
movies
-
24 uses
music
-
111 uses
napanee
-
26 uses
nostalgia
-
22 uses
politics
-
35 uses
poll
-
117 uses
smart car
-
59 uses
star trek
-
31 uses
star wars
-
51 uses
tell me
-
24 uses
tell me!
-
41 uses
toronto
-
74 uses
tv
-
288 uses
via ljapp
-
21 uses
work life
-
46 uses
wrestling
-
63 uses
writer's block
-
68 uses
xbox
-
58 uses
youtube
-
195 uses
Page Summary
indefatigable42.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
terheyt.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
pyat.livejournal.com
-
(no subject)
thebitterguy
-
You're just lazy, you know that?
paolom.livejournal.com
-
Re: You're just lazy, you know that?
thebitterguy
-
Re: You're just lazy, you know that?
Style Credit
Style:
by
timeasmymeasure
Expand Cut Tags
No cut tags
Page generated Feb. 9th, 2026 06:10 am
Powered by
Dreamwidth Studios
no subject
Date: 2004-07-17 03:59 am (UTC)I have said many times that this movie could sae the world-- we could power a few large cities with the kinetic energy of Dr. Asimov rolling in his grave.
no subject
Date: 2004-07-17 06:01 am (UTC)He is generating high torque. ;P
no subject
Date: 2004-07-17 01:55 pm (UTC)So, I am torn. :)
I'll wait for that delightful Ebert to weigh in!
You're just lazy, you know that?
Date: 2004-07-17 02:19 pm (UTC)Re: You're just lazy, you know that?
Date: 2004-07-17 04:43 pm (UTC)Re: You're just lazy, you know that?
Date: 2004-07-18 03:54 pm (UTC)Amusingly enough, it appears that a majority of reviewers like it, enough for it to earn a Fresh ratting from RT.com.
I do not endorse thse opinions. I simply report them.