What, you're his buddy now or something?
May. 22nd, 2008 03:42 pmThere are weird things to be seen online among people who talk about comic book characters. Particularly those of us who enjoy the long underwear set.
The strangest thing is the way people refer to the characters. I, personally, refer to them by their codename. That's how the book sells, right? You don't read "Invincible Daniel Rand" or ""James Barnes". You buy Iron Fist and Captain America.
It just strikes me as... strange when I see someone refer to a character by their secret ID instead of as the character. It belies a certain belief of intimacy with the character that is really not possible. Seriously, if John Byrne poops himself when people call Superman "Supes", how do you think he feels when they call him "Clark" or "Kal"?
I really don't care. That was entirely hypothetical.
In any case, yeah, I'm sure I've slipped and referred to a charatcer by non-standard nomenclature on occasion (if I ever refer to Ambusy Bug as "Irwin", shoot me in the face, m'kay?), but as a habit, or an affectation, it just seems weird. And yes, weird compared to reading funnybooks about guys in long johns punching each other.
The strangest thing is the way people refer to the characters. I, personally, refer to them by their codename. That's how the book sells, right? You don't read "Invincible Daniel Rand" or ""James Barnes". You buy Iron Fist and Captain America.
It just strikes me as... strange when I see someone refer to a character by their secret ID instead of as the character. It belies a certain belief of intimacy with the character that is really not possible. Seriously, if John Byrne poops himself when people call Superman "Supes", how do you think he feels when they call him "Clark" or "Kal"?
I really don't care. That was entirely hypothetical.
In any case, yeah, I'm sure I've slipped and referred to a charatcer by non-standard nomenclature on occasion (if I ever refer to Ambusy Bug as "Irwin", shoot me in the face, m'kay?), but as a habit, or an affectation, it just seems weird. And yes, weird compared to reading funnybooks about guys in long johns punching each other.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 07:51 pm (UTC)There's another element to consider. Geek Insider Syndrome. Referring to a superhero by their secret ID name is something that only other folks who know the character will immediately grok. Special knowledge makes one feel special.
And it's hardly unique to comics. Music snobs are far worse in this respect. If I never hear someone refer to Iggy Pop as "Jim" again, it'll be too soon.
And don't even get me started on the SCA...
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 07:55 pm (UTC)As a bit of an outsider to superhero stuff, I think it would all depend on whether a particular story was trying to make me get inside a character's head. Does Bruce Wayne still think of himself as Bruce even when he's running around being Batman, or is it assumed that there's a more fundamental internal identity shift when someone puts on a costume?
Considering that so many superheroes start out as normal people living normal lives, and then undergo a change that makes them become super, I've just always thought that they would still think of themselves by the names their parents gave them.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 07:57 pm (UTC)Just my $0.0215342. (At current exchange rates)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 08:23 pm (UTC)As a bit of an outsider to superhero stuff, I think it would all depend on whether a particular story was trying to make me get inside a character's head. Does Bruce Wayne still think of himself as Bruce even when he's running around being Batman, or is it assumed that there's a more fundamental internal identity shift when someone puts on a costume?
I think you just named one of the few superheros that likely doesn't think of himself by his real name at all :)
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 08:23 pm (UTC)I do call Superman Clark, but that's because he's more Clark to me. And hey, I have known the man for at least 45 years.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 08:32 pm (UTC)The exchange went something like this:
"How could you be sure?"
"The voice in my head called me Bruce."
"Yeah, so?"
"That's not what I call myself."
"What do you call yourself?"
(gives him just _a look_)
"Ah. Well, you're not Batman anymore."
"Tell that to my unconscious."
Really loved that bit.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 08:37 pm (UTC)Then... someone else. Spider-Man or Peter? Mister Fantastic or Reed?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 08:38 pm (UTC)Another thing you have to take into account is legacy heroes: It might be more exact to say, for example, "Barry Allen would never do that!" rather than "The Flash would never do that", because there have been several Flashes.
For icons that aren't legacies, it does seem more natural to refer to them by their code names, and a little odd to go obsessively about referring to them by their real names. Of course, one well-known creator's run on Green Arrow was remarkable for never referring to him by that name. ;)
Incidently, I think Byrne is dumb for objecting to people calling the character Supes, and so if calling him Clark annoyed him even more, I'd be more than happy to do it, even though my inclination for him is to say Superman unless I'm talking about the secret identity.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 08:38 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 08:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 08:51 pm (UTC)The X-Men also are a strange case; there was even a miniseries about Shadowcat & Wolverine entitled "Kitty Pryde & Wolverine".
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 08:53 pm (UTC)Bingo. I think you've hit the bullseye with that one.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 09:35 pm (UTC)I call most superheroes by their supernames, though, because their real names are always so bloody common. Nobody would know who I was talking about! "Ever since ol' Steve got shut down by those aliens..." Um, who?
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 09:46 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 09:51 pm (UTC)When you're talking about different people that have portrayed the same hero, such as the Flash, I can completely understand the clarification.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-22 10:07 pm (UTC)Or, conversely, trying to get through to the person under the mask/makeup/campy persona/horrible deformity. He always called Two-Face "Harvey", for instance. Sometimes, it was a way of saying, "you don't have to take this path, no matter what life's done to you."
It'd be interesting to make a list of who he called by their real names vs. code names. For some reason, I don't recall him ever calling Poison Ivy "Pamela" or even "Isely".
...of course, he almost always called Mr. Freeze "Freeze/Fries", so it's hard to tell there. =D
no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 02:32 am (UTC)Kyle Rayner is one - if I call him Green Lantern, well, there are four people still alive in the DCverse from Earth alone who go by that name, and countless others.
Roy Harper is the other. He's been Speedy (again, a heriditary title now), Arsenal, and is now Red Arrow. It's just easier.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 03:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 03:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-23 03:42 am (UTC)Five, you mean.
no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 04:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 04:23 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-05-26 09:16 pm (UTC)Obviously he does it to show that the heroes are all friends, even when that makes no sense - Robin is not going to think of Superman as 'Mister Kent' - but the effect is to make his comics (especially Justice League) feel like fanfic rather than a 'proper' comic. (The incoherent plots do that too, actually.)